Top Make Alternatives in 2026 for Data Sync
What is Make
Make (formerly Integromat) is a visual automation platform that connects 1,000+ apps through a drag-and-drop scenario builder with loops, routers, and branching logic. It rebranded from Integromat in 2022. Pricing is per-operation, starting at $9/mo for 10,000 operations, with a free plan at 1,000 operations per month.
How we score
Make: 4.5 / 5 — We rate every tool on 10 objective dimensions, each worth 0.5 points: cloud-hosted SaaS, documented API, enterprise compliance, multi-integration support, data transformation, scheduled automation, monitoring and alerts, team collaboration, published pricing, and self-serve onboarding.
Pros
Visual scenario builder with routers, iterators, and conditional branching that handles complex multi-step logic better than most competitors.
Per-operation pricing starts at $9/mo, making it accessible for small teams with low-volume automations.
Strong HTTP/webhook modules let you connect to any API, even apps without a dedicated connector.
Free tier with 1,000 operations per month is enough to test real scenarios before committing.
Stronger than Zapier for complex logic. Routers, aggregators, and array iteration give you programming-like control in a visual interface.
Cons
Per-operation pricing scales fast. A four-module scenario running 1,000 records burns 4,000 operations in one run.
Bidirectional sync requires two separate scenarios with manual deduplication logic to avoid infinite loops.
Scenario maintenance grows quietly. API changes, new fields, and rate limit updates require manual fixes across every affected scenario.
Most trigger modules poll at intervals. Instant triggers (webhooks) are not available for all apps and some require higher-tier plans.
The visual builder adds overhead to simple data movement. A trigger-map-write pattern still requires configuring four modules and an error handler.
Why look for Make alternatives
Most Make scenarios in production are simple trigger-map-write patterns that do not need a visual workflow builder.
Per-operation costs become unpredictable when data volume grows. A single high-volume sync can blow past a mid-tier plan.
Keeping two tools in sync bidirectionally requires two scenarios that can trigger each other in loops without careful deduplication.
Scenario maintenance scales linearly. Every new data flow is another visual program to build, test, and debug when APIs change.
Teams paying for complex automation capabilities end up using them mostly for straightforward data movement.
Make alternatives
Feature | Zapier | n8n | Workato | Tray.io | Oneprofile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Published pricing | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
Free tier | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
Bidirectional sync | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
Conditional logic | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ |
Visual builder | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ |
Field-level tracking | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
Error visibility | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Self-serve signup | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
1000+ connectors | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ |
Open source | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
Zapier
Zapier is the most widely used automation tool with 7,000+ app integrations and a simpler trigger-action model. It covers more apps than Make but offers less flexibility for complex routing. Per-task pricing starts at $29.99/mo for 750 tasks. Like Make, bidirectional sync requires two separate Zaps with no shared state or conflict detection.
Why choose Zapier: Largest app catalog in automation with the simplest trigger-action setup for non-technical users.
n8n
n8n is an open-source automation platform you can self-host, eliminating per-operation fees entirely. The visual builder is similar to Make's canvas approach. The community edition is free. Cloud-hosted version starts at $24/mo. The connector library is smaller than Make's, and self-hosting means your team manages uptime, backups, and upgrades.
Why choose n8n: Self-host for free with full code-level control and no per-operation fees.
Workato
Workato is an enterprise automation platform with 1,200+ connectors, batch processing, API management, and SOC 2 Type II compliance. It processes records in bulk rather than operation-by-operation. No published pricing, with contracts reportedly starting above $10,000/year. Best for companies with 200+ employees that need governance and IT-managed automation. See Best Workato Alternatives and Competitors in 2026 for a deeper comparison.
Why choose Workato: Enterprise batch processing and governance for organizations that need SOC 2 compliance and cross-department automation.
Tray.io
Tray.io sits between Make and Workato. It offers a visual builder with stronger API connectivity than Make and supports complex multi-step workflows. Enterprise pricing with no public plans. The platform targets ops teams at mid-market companies that outgrew Make's collaboration features but find Workato's price and implementation timeline excessive.
Why choose Tray.io: Mid-market sweet spot with more API flexibility than Make and faster deployment than Workato.
Oneprofile
Oneprofile connects SaaS tools and databases with bidirectional sync from a single configuration. No visual builder, no modules to wire together. Pricing is published: $100/mo Team (1M sync actions included), $2,000/mo Enterprise. Oneprofile handles data sync between tools, not conditional workflow automation. If your scenarios involve branching logic, approvals, or multi-step sequences, Make's visual scenario builder is purpose-built for that.
Why choose Oneprofile: Replace repetitive data-movement scenarios with one bidirectional sync config at flat pricing.
Is Make still called Integromat?
Can Oneprofile replace Make for all use cases?
How does Make pricing compare to Oneprofile?
Does Oneprofile support the same apps as Make?
What happens to my Make scenarios if I switch?
Do I need a data warehouse before I can use a CDP?